1 de 1 copias disponibles
Observaciones en torno a la formación histórica de la regla ‘in dubio contra fiscum (pro fisco)’ y a la recta interpretación de Mod. L. sing. de praescript. D. 49.14.10
The author intends to criticise the relationship between the rule 'in dubio contra fiscum' (or pro fisco), that belongs to the ius commune, nowadays rejected by the modern doctrine of tax law, and the text written by the roman jurist Modestinus (D. 49.14.10), often identified as its source. It also intends to afford the question referring its right interpretation.
1. Introducción
2. Interpretación del fragmento 36 del Panegírico de Trajano
3. La regla in dubio contra fiscum (pro fisco) y su valoración doctrinal moderna
4. El framento 10º de D. 49.14 de Modestino
5. Contexto del fragmento en la obra de Modestino
6. Un comentario lemático provisional
7. Primeras observaciones
8. Revisión
9. Conclusiones
- Formato: PDF
- Tamaño: 339 Kb.
The author intends to criticise the relationship between the rule 'in dubio contra fiscum' (or pro fisco), that belongs to the ius commune, nowadays rejected by the modern doctrine of tax law, and the text written by the roman jurist Modestinus (D. 49.14.10), often identified as its source. It also intends to afford the question referring its right interpretation.
1. Introducción
2. Interpretación del fragmento 36 del Panegírico de Trajano
3. La regla in dubio contra fiscum (pro fisco) y su valoración doctrinal moderna
4. El framento 10º de D. 49.14 de Modestino
5. Contexto del fragmento en la obra de Modestino
6. Un comentario lemático provisional
7. Primeras observaciones
8. Revisión
9. Conclusiones
¿Dudas o problemas de acceso?