1 de 1 copias disponibles
The relationship between Part 26 A restructuring plans and schemes of arrangement
This paper describes the origins, and potential uses, of the new UK Restructuring Plan procedure. It then sets out the key differences between Restructuring Plans and the existing Scheme of Arrangement regime, considering how significant these differences are in practice. Finally, it summarises the impact, to date, of Restructuring Plans.
I. THE ORIGINS OF THE RESTRUCTURING PLAN
II. WHY DID THE UK NOT JUST AMENO THE EXISTING SCHEME LEGISLATION?
III. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN RESTRUCTURING PLANS AND SCHEMES
IV. THE KEY DIFFERENCES BETWEEN RESTRUCTURING PLANS AND SCHEMES
V. THE FIRST KEY DIFFERENCE - CROSS-CLASS CRAM-DOWN
VI. THE STATUTORY CROSS-CLASS CRAM-DOWN PROCEDURE IN MORE DETAIL
VII. THE COURT'S GENERAL DISCRETION IN RELATION TO CROSS-CLASS CRAM-DOWN
VIII. PRACTICAL LIMITATIONS ON THE USE OF CROSS-CLASS CRAM-DOWN
IX. AN ALTERNATIVE WAY OF ACHIEVING CROSS-CLASS CRAM-DOWN
X. THE SECOND KEY DIFFERENCE - CRAM-UP
XI. THE THIRD KEY DIFFERENCE — ABOLITION OF THE NUMEROSITY TEST
XII. THE FOURTH KEY DIFFERENCE - THE -THRESHOLD CONDITIONT RELATING TO THE FINANCIAL POSITION OF THE COMPANY AND THEIR IMPACT ON JURISDICTIONAL ISSUES
XIII. THE FIFTH KEY DIFFERENCE — THE ABILITY TO ALTER SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS
XIV. PRACTICAL LIMITATIONS ON THE ABILITY TO ALTER SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS
XV. THE IMPACT OF RESTRUCTURING PLANS TO DATE.
- Formato: PDF
- Tamaño: 320 Kb.
This paper describes the origins, and potential uses, of the new UK Restructuring Plan procedure. It then sets out the key differences between Restructuring Plans and the existing Scheme of Arrangement regime, considering how significant these differences are in practice. Finally, it summarises the impact, to date, of Restructuring Plans.
I. THE ORIGINS OF THE RESTRUCTURING PLAN
II. WHY DID THE UK NOT JUST AMENO THE EXISTING SCHEME LEGISLATION?
III. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN RESTRUCTURING PLANS AND SCHEMES
IV. THE KEY DIFFERENCES BETWEEN RESTRUCTURING PLANS AND SCHEMES
V. THE FIRST KEY DIFFERENCE - CROSS-CLASS CRAM-DOWN
VI. THE STATUTORY CROSS-CLASS CRAM-DOWN PROCEDURE IN MORE DETAIL
VII. THE COURT'S GENERAL DISCRETION IN RELATION TO CROSS-CLASS CRAM-DOWN
VIII. PRACTICAL LIMITATIONS ON THE USE OF CROSS-CLASS CRAM-DOWN
IX. AN ALTERNATIVE WAY OF ACHIEVING CROSS-CLASS CRAM-DOWN
X. THE SECOND KEY DIFFERENCE - CRAM-UP
XI. THE THIRD KEY DIFFERENCE — ABOLITION OF THE NUMEROSITY TEST
XII. THE FOURTH KEY DIFFERENCE - THE -THRESHOLD CONDITIONT RELATING TO THE FINANCIAL POSITION OF THE COMPANY AND THEIR IMPACT ON JURISDICTIONAL ISSUES
XIII. THE FIFTH KEY DIFFERENCE — THE ABILITY TO ALTER SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS
XIV. PRACTICAL LIMITATIONS ON THE ABILITY TO ALTER SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS
XV. THE IMPACT OF RESTRUCTURING PLANS TO DATE.
¿Dudas o problemas de acceso?