1 de 1 copias disponibles
The European Public Prosecutor’s Office - the protection of the EU’s financial interests as supranational integration project –
El presente artículo ofrece una descripción general de las competencias de la recientemente creada Fiscalía Europea (“EPPO”), un organismo supranacional que investiga y persigue delitos penales que afectan los intereses financieros de la Unión Europea (“UE”). Se discutirán varios aspectos relacionados con el procedimiento penal y el derecho penal material con el fin de explicar cómo la Fiscalía Europea se inserta en los sistemas judiciales nacionales a pesar de su origen supranacional. Entre los asuntos a ser examinados estará el requisito de perseguir el delito de manera eficiente, asegurando que los derechos procesales de los sospechosos y acusados serán debidamente respetados. Se prestará especial atención a la cooperación con otras entidades de la UE y autoridades nacionales tanto en los Estados miembros como en terceros países. Los elementos contenidos en este artículo permitirán al lector evaluar si la Fiscalía Europea ha cumplido los objetivos trazados por el legislador de la UE.
I. Introduction
II. THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE EPPO
III. HYBRID ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE
1. The central level
2. The decentralized level
IV. Competence and tasks
1. Supervision and instructions
2. Material competence
3. Territorial competence
4. Initiation, termination of the investigation and prosecution
5. Lifting of privileges or immunities
V. Rights and procedural safeguards foreseen in EU law
1. Rights enshrined in the EPPO Regulation and harmonized minimal standards
2. The European Convention on Human Rights
3. Procedural rights available under the applicable national law
4. Data protection rules
5. Procedural rights in the cases involving non-participating Member States and third countries
6. Mechanisms of control and legal remedies
VI. Legal review
VII. Issues arising from the interaction with national law
1. The EU legislator’s choice in favor of an intergovernmental model
2. The institutional anchoring of the European Delegated Prosecutors in the national judicial systems
3. The incomplete harmonization of substantive criminal law
4. Diversity of national procedural rules
5. Use of autonomous concepts with a view to address the reality of national law
6. Sentencing and sanctions
VIII. COOPERATION
1. The cooperation with other EU bodies
1.1. EUROJUST
1.2. OLAF
1.3. EUROPOL
2. The cooperation with non-participating Member States
3. The cooperation with third countries
IX. General aspects concerning the functioning of the EPPO
1. Working languages
2. Legal personality and capacity
3. Luxembourg as “judicial capital” of Europe
4. Transparency and public access to documents
5. Staff rules
6. Case management system and other IT tools
X. The future of criminal justice
1. The possible extension of the EPPO’s mandate to other serious crimes
2. European Criminal Court and European Criminal Defense?
XI. Looking back at the first year of operation
XII. Conclusions
- Formato: PDF
- Tamaño: 640 Kb.
El presente artículo ofrece una descripción general de las competencias de la recientemente creada Fiscalía Europea (“EPPO”), un organismo supranacional que investiga y persigue delitos penales que afectan los intereses financieros de la Unión Europea (“UE”). Se discutirán varios aspectos relacionados con el procedimiento penal y el derecho penal material con el fin de explicar cómo la Fiscalía Europea se inserta en los sistemas judiciales nacionales a pesar de su origen supranacional. Entre los asuntos a ser examinados estará el requisito de perseguir el delito de manera eficiente, asegurando que los derechos procesales de los sospechosos y acusados serán debidamente respetados. Se prestará especial atención a la cooperación con otras entidades de la UE y autoridades nacionales tanto en los Estados miembros como en terceros países. Los elementos contenidos en este artículo permitirán al lector evaluar si la Fiscalía Europea ha cumplido los objetivos trazados por el legislador de la UE.
I. Introduction
II. THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE EPPO
III. HYBRID ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE
1. The central level
2. The decentralized level
IV. Competence and tasks
1. Supervision and instructions
2. Material competence
3. Territorial competence
4. Initiation, termination of the investigation and prosecution
5. Lifting of privileges or immunities
V. Rights and procedural safeguards foreseen in EU law
1. Rights enshrined in the EPPO Regulation and harmonized minimal standards
2. The European Convention on Human Rights
3. Procedural rights available under the applicable national law
4. Data protection rules
5. Procedural rights in the cases involving non-participating Member States and third countries
6. Mechanisms of control and legal remedies
VI. Legal review
VII. Issues arising from the interaction with national law
1. The EU legislator’s choice in favor of an intergovernmental model
2. The institutional anchoring of the European Delegated Prosecutors in the national judicial systems
3. The incomplete harmonization of substantive criminal law
4. Diversity of national procedural rules
5. Use of autonomous concepts with a view to address the reality of national law
6. Sentencing and sanctions
VIII. COOPERATION
1. The cooperation with other EU bodies
1.1. EUROJUST
1.2. OLAF
1.3. EUROPOL
2. The cooperation with non-participating Member States
3. The cooperation with third countries
IX. General aspects concerning the functioning of the EPPO
1. Working languages
2. Legal personality and capacity
3. Luxembourg as “judicial capital” of Europe
4. Transparency and public access to documents
5. Staff rules
6. Case management system and other IT tools
X. The future of criminal justice
1. The possible extension of the EPPO’s mandate to other serious crimes
2. European Criminal Court and European Criminal Defense?
XI. Looking back at the first year of operation
XII. Conclusions
- Unión Europea
- Fiscalía Europea
- cooperación internacional
- intereses financieros
- cumplimiento de la ley
- procedimiento penal
- derechos fundamentales
- Imperio de la ley
- European Union
- European Public Prosecutor
- international cooperation
- financial interests
- law enforcement
- criminal procedure
- fundamental rights
- rule of law
¿Dudas o problemas de acceso?